PEDIATRICS Vol. 88 No. 3 September 1991, pp. 518
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GLASCOE, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by BAUMGAERTEL, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GLASCOE, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by BAUMGAERTEL, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews of Lay Literature in Child-Care: What Parents Are Reading

FRANCES PAGE GLASCOE PhD1, WILLIAM O. MOORE MD1, and ANNA BAUMGAERTEL MD1

1 Child Development Center, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

L. Canter, L. Hausner. Homework without Tears. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1987; list price $7.95 (No. 30 on the 1990 bestseller list of books on child care from Ingram Book Co., distributor of trade books).

This text offers parents some solid advice about children and homework, including: establishing an appropriate study area, working with teachers, time management, task analysis, test preparation and independent completion of work. The authors wander onto shaky ground when they suggest that parents should not help children learn concepts and when they fail to mention that a child's need for assistance with homework may be indicative of significant trouble with school work and learning problems. Accordingly, parents are not directed toward psychoeducational evaluations, tutors or other resources. Further, they are not helped to acquire insight into their child's feelings about school, developmental readiness for various academic activities, self-concept, peer pressure, or the impact of different kinds of educational experiences (e.g., self-versus teacher-directed activities, private versus public schools, large versus small classes, etc.). Despite these weaknesses, the book contains many helpful suggestions and fills a void in the offerings on child-care by focusing specifically on homework issues.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?