PEDIATRICS Vol. 87 No. 4 April 1991, pp. 475-480
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babonis, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babonis, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. C.

Impedance Tympanometry and Acoustic Reflectometry at Myringotomy

Thomas R. Babonis MC, USA1, Michael R. Weir MC, USA1, and Patrick C. Kelly MC, USA1

1 From the Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington

A total of 220 ears undergoing myringotomy and pressure-equalizing tube placement were studied with impedance tympanometry and acoustic reflectometry in a direct comparison for detection of middle-ear effusion. Impedance tympanometry and acoustic reflectometry were equally accurate, detecting the presence or absence of middle-ear effusion in 73% and 72% of ears, respectively. The presence of effusion in ears with tympanographic patterns other than type A and type B was not consistently and reliably predicted. The higher sensitivity of impedance tympanometry (90%) compared with that for acoustic reflectometry (58%) contrasted with the opposite findings for specificities (54% vs 88%). It is concluded that impedance tympanometry and acoustic reflectometry measure different events at the tympanic membrane and their utility lies in the fact that they complement each other. These instruments can aid the experienced otoscopist in confirming a clinical impression and assist the less experienced clinician in validating or improving otoscopic skills.

Key Words: myringotomy • impedance tympanometry • acoustic reflectometry • middle-ear effusion

Submitted on February 26, 1990
Accepted on June 29, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
G. S. Takata, L. S. Chan, T. Morphew, R. Mangione-Smith, S. C. Morton, and P. Shekelle
Evidence Assessment of the Accuracy of Methods of Diagnosing Middle Ear Effusion in Children With Otitis Media With Effusion
Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1379 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
C C Butler and H MacMillan
Does early detection of otitis media with effusion prevent delayed language development?
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2001; 85(2): 96 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
T. Babonis, M. R. Weir, P. C. Kelly, and M. S. Krober
Progression of Tympanometry and Acoustic Reflectometry: Findings in Children With Acute Otitis Media
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1994; 33(10): 593 - 600.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. R. Murph, L. B. Dusdieker, B. Booth, and W. E. Murph
Is Treatment of Acute Otitis Media With Once-a-Day Amoxicillin Feasible?: Results of a Pilot Study
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 1993; 32(9): 528 - 534.
[Abstract] [PDF]