PEDIATRICS Vol. 86 No. 3 September 1990, pp. 357-362
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vernon, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Menegus, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vernon, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Menegus, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Semipermeable Dressing and Transepidermal Water Loss in Premature Infants

Hazel J. Vernon MD1, Alfred T. Lane MD1, Linda J. Wischerath MSN1, Jonathan M. Davis MD1, and Marilyn A. Menegus PhD1

1 Departments of Dermatology, Pediatrics (Neonatology), and Microbiology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York

Within the first days of life, 10 infants, of 32 weeks' gestational age or less, began 2 weeks of treatment with a semipermeable wound dressing over a small area of skin. The effects of the dressing on transepidermal water loss and cutaneous microflora were evaluated. Transepidermal water loss from the semipermeable dressing-treated skin was significantly less than that from the untreated skin immediately after placement of the dressing (8.1 ± 1.8 g/m2 · h-1 vs 17.7 ± 3.5 g/m2 · h-1, P < .0001). The normal accelerated skin maturation process that occurs in these infants continued beneath the semipermeable dressing. The number of gram-negative bacilli or other bacteria did not increase beneath the semipermeable dressing beyond that seen on the untreated site. Malassezia furfur was found only on the control site, never beneath the semipermeable dressing. According to results of this preliminary study, a semipermeable dressing can be safely used in premature infants and the use of a semipermeable dressing may decrease the excessive transepidermal water loss associated with prematurity.

Submitted on June 23, 1989
Accepted on November 14, 1989


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. R. Campbell, E. Zaccaria, and C. J. Baker
Systemic Candidiasis in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants Receiving Topical Petrolatum Ointment for Skin Care: A Case-Control Study
Pediatrics, May 1, 2000; 105(5): 1041 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 DevelopmentHome page
M. Hardman, P Sisi, D. Banbury, and C Byrne
Patterned acquisition of skin barrier function during development
Development, January 4, 1998; 125(8): 1541 - 1552.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. L. Ariagno, S. F. Glotzbach, R. B. Baldwin, D. M. Rector, S. M. Bowley, and R. J. Moffat
Dew-point hygrometry system for measurement of evaporative water loss in infants
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1997; 82(3): 1008 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]