PEDIATRICS Vol. 85 No. 1 January 1990, pp. 58-62
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tarnowski, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tarnowski, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, P. A.

Readability of Pediatric Biomedical Research Informed Consent Forms

Kenneth J. Tarnowski PhD1, Denise M. Allen MA1, Christine Mayhall MA1, and Patricia A. Kelly BA1

1 From the Departments of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University and Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, Ohio State University, Columbus, and University of South Carolina, Columbia

Informed consent forms are used in biomedical research as a mechanism to convey study information to potential subjects so that they may arrive at a decision concerning their willingness to participate. Although the Department of Health and Human Services Regulations for the Protection of Human Subjects require the presentation of specific study information at a level that is easily understood, according to research concerning adult biomedical consent forms, the typical form is not readily comprehensible. Unfortunately, no data exist concerning the readability of informed consent forms that are used in the context of pediatric biomedical research. In the present study, readability analyses were conducted on a large sample (N = 238) of pediatric biomedical informed consent forms obtained during a 10-year period from a large midwestern children's hospital. For the entire sample, results derived from two readability estimates (Fry grade equivalent and Flesch Reading Ease methods) indicated that the consent forms were written at the college graduate level. Although there was a linear increase in the length of the consent document during the 10-year period evaluated, expanded length was not associated with improved readability. According to analyses, a differential pattern of reading difficulty was associated with specific sections of the informed consent document. Findings are highly consistent with those from studies of adult biomedical consent forms and document that the purpose of the informed consent form is being compromised, in part, by a readability factor. Suggestions for solving this critical problem are advanced.

Key Words: informed consent • readability analyses

Submitted on January 20, 1989
Accepted on March 3, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 QJMHome page
P. Fortun, J. West, L. Chalkley, A. Shonde, and C. Hawkey
Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials
QJM, August 1, 2008; 101(8): 625 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
A. Chang
An Exploratory Survey of Nurses' Perceptions of Phase I Clinical Trials in Pediatric Oncology
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, February 1, 2008; 25(1): 14 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. R. Tait, T. Voepel-Lewis, and S. Malviya
Presenting Research Information to Children: A Tale of Two Methods
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 358 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
J. L. Calderon, L. S. Morales, H. Liu, and R. D. Hays
Variation in the Readability of Items Within Surveys
American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 49 - 56.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
F M Russell, J R Carapetis, H Liddle, T Edwards, T A Ruff, and J Devitt
A pilot study of the quality of informed consent materials for Aboriginal participants in clinical trials
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2005; 31(8): 490 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. R. Tait, T. Voepel-Lewis, S. Malviya, and S. J. Philipson
Improving the Readability and Processability of a Pediatric Informed Consent Document: Effects on Parents' Understanding
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2005; 159(4): 347 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Nutr.Home page
G. S. Burke
Looking into the Institutional Review Board: Observations from Both Sides of the Table
J. Nutr., April 1, 2005; 135(4): 921 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
A. Chang
Nurses' Perceptions of Phase I Clinical Trials in Pediatric Oncology: A Review of the Literature
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, November 1, 2004; 21(6): 343 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CA Cancer J ClinHome page
T. C. Davis, M. V. Williams, E. Marin, R. M. Parker, and J. Glass
Health Literacy and Cancer Communication
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2002; 52(3): 134 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. O. Erb, S. R. Schulman, and J. Sugarman
Permission and Assent for Clinical Research in Pediatric Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1155 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
P R Ferguson
Patients' perceptions of information provided in clinical trials
J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2002; 28(1): 45 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
C. K. Daugherty
Impact of Therapeutic Research on Informed Consent and the Ethics of Clinical Trials: A Medical Oncology Perspective
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1601 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
R. D. Truog, W. Robinson, A. Randolph, and A. Morris
Is Informed Consent Always Necessary for Randomized, Controlled Trials?
N. Engl. J. Med., March 11, 1999; 340(10): 804 - 807.
[Full Text]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M. van Stuijvenberg, M. H Suur, S. de Vos, G. C H Tjiang, E. W Steyerberg, G. Derksen-Lubsen, and H. A Moll
Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study
Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 1998; 79(2): 120 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
H. B. Jimison, P. P. Sher, R. Appleyard, and Y. LeVernois
The Use of Multimedia in the Informed Consent Process
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 1998; 5(3): 245 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
K. Ruccione, R. F. Kramer, I. K. Moore, and G. Perin
Informed Consent for Treatment of Childhood Cancer: Factors Affecting Parents' Decision Making
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, January 1, 1991; 8(3): 112 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]