PEDIATRICS Vol. 84 No. 4 October 1989, pp. A100
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Student,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Student,

QUO VADIS?

Student

There are growing concerns, among physicians and others in the US, about the impact of [present] policies on medical care costs, on the commercialisation of medicine, and on physician autonomy. As a result of the new market-oriented policies, physicians in the US are now the most litigated-against, second-guessed, and paperwork-laden physicians in western industrialised democracies. Physicians' day-to-day clinical decisionmaking—commonly referred to as clinical freedom—is increasingly subject to review and appoval by "case managers" working for employers, insurance carriers, and government financed and regulated professional review organisations. Malpractice suits and administrative costs are multiplying. The growing adversarial relationship with private and public payers and loss of physican autonomy are closely related to the growing view that medical care should be treated like any other private business.