PEDIATRICS Vol. 84 No. 2 August 1989, pp. 374-380
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hetherington, J.
Right arrow Articles by Meinert, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hetherington, J.
Right arrow Articles by Meinert, C. L.

Retrospective and Prospective Identification of Unpublished Controlled Trials: Lessons From a Survey of Obstetricians and Pediatricians

Jini Hetherington 1, Kay Dickersin PhD1, Iain Chalmers BBS, FRCOG1, and Curtis L. Meinert PhD1

1 The National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, England, and The Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Investigations in which statistically significant differences between treatment groups have not been observed are less likely than others to be reported in scientific journals. In clinical research, this selective suppression of "negative" results may lead to the adoption of ineffective or hazardous treatments. In an attempt to obtain information about unpublished trials in perinatal medicine, letters were sent to 42 000 obstetricians and pediatricians in 18 countries. As a result, we were notified of 395 unpublished randomized trials. Only 18 of the trials had been completed more than 2 years before the survey, a period during which at least 2300 reports of perinatal trials had been published. Of the 395 unpublished trials, 125 had ceased recruitment within the 2 years prior to the survey, 193 were actively recruiting at the time of the survey, and 59 were about to begin recruitment. It was concluded that publication bias will not be addressed successfully by attempts to obtain information about unpublished trials retrospectively. However, since the response rate to our request for details about ongoing and planned trials was good, prospective registration of trials at inception appears to be a feasible approach to reducing publication bias and its adverse consequences. An additional merit of prospective registration of clinical trials is that it should reduce unnecessary duplication (as opposed to necessary replication) in research and promote more effective collaboration.

Key Words: unpubliahed controlled trial • publication bias • controlled trial regiatration • perinatal trial

Submitted on November 15, 1988
Accepted on February 8, 1989




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. R. Lynch, M. R.A. Cunningham, W. J. Warme, D. C. Schaad, F. M. Wolf, and S. S. Leopold
Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are Not
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2007; 89(5): 1010 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JRSMHome page
I. Chalmers
From optimism to disillusion about commitment to transparency in the medico-industrial complex
J R Soc Med, July 1, 2006; 99(7): 337 - 341.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
M Bonati and C Pandolfini
Trial registration, the ICMJE statement, and paediatric journals
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2006; 91(1): 93 - 93.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
S. Cure, W. L. Chua, L. Duggan, and C. Adams
Randomised controlled trials relevant to aggressive and violent people, 1955-2000: a survey
The British Journal of Psychiatry, March 1, 2005; 186(3): 185 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin TrialsHome page
K. Dickersin, B. R Davis, D. O Dixon, S. L George, B. S Hawkins, J. Lachin, P. Peduzzig, and S. Pocock
The Society for Clinical Trials supports United States legislation mandating trials registration
Clinical Trials, October 1, 2004; 1(5): 417 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
L. Hartling, W. R. Craig, K. Russell, K. Stevens, and T. P. Klassen
Factors Influencing the Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health Research
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2004; 158(10): 983 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
K. Dickersin and D. Rennie
Registering Clinical Trials
JAMA, July 23, 2003; 290(4): 516 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
E. Manheimer and D. Anderson
Survey of public information about ongoing clinical trials funded by industry: evaluation of completeness and accessibility
BMJ, September 7, 2002; 325(7363): 528 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
A.-B. Haidich and J. P. A. Ioannidis
Effect of Early Patient Enrollment on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Controlled Trials
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2001; 154(9): 873 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
D. F. Stroup, J. A. Berlin, S. C. Morton, I. Olkin, G. D. Williamson, D. Rennie, D. Moher, B. J. Becker, T. A. Sipe, S. B. Thacker, et al.
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting
JAMA, April 19, 2000; 283(15): 2008 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
D. Rennie
Fair Conduct and Fair Reporting of Clinical Trials
JAMA, November 10, 1999; 282(18): 1766 - 1768.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
P. D. Walson
Patient Recruitment: US Perspective
Pediatrics, September 1, 1999; 104(3): 619 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
J. P. A. Ioannidis
Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials
JAMA, January 28, 1998; 279(4): 281 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
C. Sakala
The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database: Implications for Perinatal Care Policy and Practice in the United States
Eval Health Prof, December 1, 1995; 18(4): 428 - 466.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science CommunicationHome page
D. Indyk and D. A. Rier
Grassroots AIDS Knowledge: Implications for the Boundaries of Science and Collective Action
Science Communication, September 1, 1993; 15(1): 3 - 43.
[Abstract]