PEDIATRICS Vol. 83 No. 5 May 1989, pp. A86
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Student,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Student,

ELECTRONIC FETAL MONITORING: WISHING AWAY TRUTH

Student

The act of throwing into stark relief the unreliability of intrapartum EFM as a predictor of long-term neurological outcome threatens two other much more important beliefs: that the use of EFM can prevent cerebral palsy and that intrapartum asphyxia is the cause of cerebral palsy. It is no wonder that there is resistance to collecting relevant evidence and giving it credence. "I had not properly realised, until this time, the power of wish to distort and deny—and its prevalence in this complex situation, where enthusiasm of doctors and the distress of patients, might lie in an unconscious collusion, equally concerned to wish away an unpalatable truth."