PEDIATRICS Vol. 83 No. 4 April 1989, pp. 486-492
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, A. Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gibson, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, A. Q.

Retinopathy of Prematurity: A New Epidemic?

Donna L. Gibson MSc1, Samuel B. Sheps MD, MSc, FRCPC1, Martin T. Schechter MD, MSc, PhD1, Sandra Wiggins MA1, and Andrew Q. McCormick MD, FRCSC1

1 The Departments of Health Care and Epidemiology, and Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

This study provides the first empiric evidence for the existence of a new epidemic of retinopathy of prematurity-induced blindness. Data from a population-based register of handicapping conditions in the Canadian province of British Columbia, and a birth weight-specific census of live-born infants in British Columbia, were used to determine annual, population-level incidences of retinopathy of prematurity-induced blindness during 1952 to 1983. Changes in incidence since the end of the original epidemic (1954) were determined by subdividing the 29-year period (1955 to 1983) into two intervals (1955 to 1964 and 1965 to 1983). Standardized incidence ratio analyses revealed a marginally significant increase in the overall incidence of retinopathy of prematurity-induced blindness in the later as compared with the earlier period. Infants weighing 750 to 999 g at birth had a significantly increased standardized incidence ratio of 3.07 (95% confidence interval 1.26, 11.06). No increases in risk were observed in heavier or lighter weight infants. Because ascertainment and diagnostic changes do not explain the weight-specific increases in incidence, these results provide the first population-level evidence for a new epidemic.

Key Words: retinopathy of prematurity

Submitted on March 17, 1988
Accepted on May 18, 1988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Dhaliwal, B Fleck, E Wright, C Graham, and N McIntosh
Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity in Lothian, Scotland, from 1990 to 2004
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2008; 93(6): F422 - F426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R Karkhaneh, S Z Mousavi, M Riazi-Esfahani, S A Ebrahimzadeh, R Roohipoor, M Kadivar, L Ghalichi, S F Mohammadi, and M R Mansouri
Incidence and risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity in a tertiary eye hospital in Tehran
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2008; 92(11): 1446 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S Varughese, C Gilbert, C Pieper, and C Cook
Retinopathy of prematurity in South Africa: an assessment of needs, resources and requirements for screening programmes
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2008; 92(7): 879 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
A. R. Fielder
Premature for Life
Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2005; 123(3): 392 - 394.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. W. Doyle and the Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group
Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in Victoria Over Two Decades: I. Effectiveness
Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 505 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C M Wheatley, J L Dickinson, D A Mackey, J E Craig, and M M Sale
Retinopathy of prematurity: recent advances in our understanding
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2002; 87(2): F78 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C M Wheatley, J L Dickinson, D A Mackey, J E Craig, and M M Sale
Retinopathy of prematurity: recent advances in our understanding
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2002; 86(6): 696 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
E Rowlands, A C W Ionides, S Chinn, H Mackinnon, and C C Davey
Reduced incidence of retinopathy of prematurity
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2001; 85(8): 933 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Cunningham, J. R. McColm, J. Wade, K. Sedowofia, N. McIntosh, and B. Fleck
A Novel Model of Retinopathy of Prematurity Simulating Preterm Oxygen Variability in the Rat
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2000; 41(13): 4275 - 4280.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M. B Mizoguchi, T. G Chu, F. M Murphy, N. Willits, and L. S Morse
Dopamine use is an indicator for the development of threshold retinopathy of prematurity
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 1999; 83(4): 425 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
I A Pearce, F C Pennie, L M Gannon, A M Weindling, and D I Clark
Three year visual outcome for treated stage 3 retinopathy of prematurity: cryotherapy versus laser
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 1998; 82(11): 1254 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text]