PEDIATRICS Vol. 83 No. 3 March 1989, pp. A92
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Student,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Student,

SUBGROUP ANALYSES ISSUE: ASTROLOGICAL BIRTH SIGN, FOR EXAMPLE

Student

[In a large trial], reliable indication of subgroups of patients among whom treatment is particularly advantageous (or among whom it is ineffective) is unlikely to be possible. When a trial is clearly positive overall many subgroup analyses are considered, false negative results in some particular subgroups must be expected. For example, a subdivision of the patients in [international streptokinase/aspirin trial] with respect to their astrological birth signs appears to indicate that for patients born under Gemini or Libra there was a slightly adverse effect of aspirin on mortality . . . while for all patients born under other signs there was a strikingly beneficial effect . . . It is, of course, clear that the best estimate of the real size of the treatment effect in each astrological subgroup is given not by the results in that subgroup alone but by the overall results in all subgroups combined.