PEDIATRICS Vol. 83 No. 3 March 1989, pp. A58
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Student,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Student,

BARZUN ON TESTING STUDENTS

Student

Multiple-choice questions test nothing but passive-recognition knowledge, not active usable knowledge.

Knowing something means the power to summon up facts and their significance in the right relations. Mechanical testing does not foster this power. It is one thing to pick out Valley Forge, not Dobbs Ferry or Little Rock, as the place where George Washington made his winter quarters; it is another, first, to think of Valley Forge and then to say why he chose it rather than Philadelphia, where it was warmer.

In subjects that require something other than information—the development of skill, as in reading, writing and mathematics—straining toward a plausible choice is not instructional. Nobody ever learned to write better by filling in blanks with proffered verbs and adjectives. To write is to fill a totally blank sheet with words of your own.

Instead of forcing—and coaching—young minds in form-filling exercises, telling them "choose and take a chance," schools would be well advised to return to Ralph Waldo Emerson's "Tell us what you know."