PEDIATRICS Vol. 83 No. 3 March 1989, pp. A44
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Student,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Student,

TOBACCO CHARADES

Student

Taxpayers underwrite price supports for tobacco farmers while also paying the Surgeon General to try to eliminate tobacco use. Cigarette companies squeeze ever-increasing profits from the very health fears surrounding smoking. Filter cigarettes were widely introduced in the 1950's in response to the first studies showing that smoking causes lung cancer. Although, as the author notes, "there was no evidence" that filter-tipped cigarettes "offered any significant protection from the diseases of smoking," they turned out to be both cheaper to make and more attractive to smokers than nonfilters, boosting the industry's profits on two counts. The potential legal liability in making and selling cigarettes insures their continuing profitability by keeping would-be competitors out of the market. Banning cigarette advertising on television hardly dented sales, but saved the tobacco companies billions, which they, in turn, have invested in business like General Foods, CBS and life insurance companies (which charge smokers high rates).