PEDIATRICS Vol. 83 No. 2 February 1989, pp. 168-180
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valdez, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Newhouse, J. P.

Prepaid Group Practice Effects on the Utilization of Medical Services and Health Outcomes for Children: Results From a Controlled Trial

R. Burciaga Valdez PhD1, John E. Ware Jr PhD1, Willard G. Manning PhD1, Robert H. Brook MD1, William H. Rogers PhD1, George A. Goldberg MD1, and Joseph P. Newhouse PhD1

1 The Health Science Program, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, and the Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Center for the Health Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles

A total of 693 children between the ages of 0 and 13 years were randomly assigned to either a staff model HMO or to one of several fee-for-service insurance plans in Seattle to evaluate differences in medical expenditures and health outcomes. Although the fee-for-service plans varied the amount of cost sharing (0% to 95%), all children were covered for the same medical services, for either 3 or 5 years. No differences in imputed total expenditures were observed for children assigned to the HMO or any of the fee-for-service plans. Children with cost-sharing fee-for-service plans, however, had fewer medical contacts and received fewer preventive services than those assigned to the HMO. Nonetheless, children with the cost-sharing fee-for-service plans were perceived (by their mothers) to be in better health overall than those assigned to the HMO. No significant differences regarding physiological outcomes (eg, visual acuity, hemoglobin level) were observed between the two groups. The results of this experiment neither strongly support nor indict fee-for-service or prepaid care for children.

Key Words: health • insurance • health maintenance organization • medical care organization

Submitted on October 5, 1987
Accepted on January 14, 1988




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Pati, S. Shea, D. Rabinowitz, and O. Carrasquillo
Does Gatekeeping Control Costs for Privately Insured Children? Findings From the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Pediatrics, March 1, 2003; 111(3): 456 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. A. Finkelstein, M. B. Barton, J. G. Donahue, P. Algatt-Bergstrom, L. E. Markson, and R. Platt
Comparing Asthma Care for Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Children in a Health Maintenance Organization
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2000; 154(6): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. B. Bocian, R. C. Wasserman, E. J. Slora, D. Kessel, and R. S. Miller
Size and Age-Sex Distribution of Pediatric Practice: A Study From Pediatric Research in Office Settings
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 1999; 153(1): 9 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. M. Adams, J. Moreno, K. Reynolds, D. W. Campbell IV, E. O'B. Smith, and L. E. Weisman
Resource Utilization Among Neonatologists in a University Children's Hospital
Pediatrics, June 1, 1997; 99(6): e2 - e2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
PEDIATRIC CARE IN HMOS VS. FEE-FOR-SERVICE PRACTICES
Journal Watch (General), February 17, 1989; 1989(217): 9 - 9.
[Full Text]