PEDIATRICS Vol. 82 No. 6 December 1988, pp. 896-904
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gould, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by LeRoy, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gould, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by LeRoy, S.

Socioeconomic Status and Low Birth Weight: A Racial Comparison

Jeffrey B. Gould MD, MPH1 and Susan LeRoy PhD1

1 From the University of California, Maternal and Child Health Program, School of Public Health, Berkeley

The relationships between socioeconomic status, low birth weight, births to teenagers, and inadequate prenatal care were compared among white and black infants. A cohort of 127,558 singleton births, born from 1982 to 1983 in Los Angeles County, California, was evaluated. Socioeconomic status was estimated by the 1979 median family income of the census tract of maternal residence. For both racial groups the deterioration of residential area socioeconomic status was associated with a significant increase in the percentage of high-risk teenage mothers (<17 years of age), in the percentage of mothers with either no, only third trimester, or unknown prenatal care, and in the percentage of low birth weight infants. The rate of increase in the percentage of low birth weight in response to the socioeconomic deterioration of residential area was similar in black and in white groups. There was, however, a racial gap of 5% low birth weight that remained constant across all income areas. At the individual level, there were marked racial differences in the relative risks imposed by one's residential median family income, age, prenatal care, and pattern of interactions.

Key Words: low birth weight infant • socioeconomic status • poverty • race

Accepted on November 18, 1987




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. B. Gould, A. Madan, C. Qin, and G. Chavez
Perinatal Outcomes in Two Dissimilar Immigrant Populations in the United States: A Dual Epidemiologic Paradox
Pediatrics, June 1, 2003; 111(6): e676 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. Pearl, P. Braveman, and B. Abrams
The Relationship of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Characteristics to Birthweight Among 5 Ethnic Groups in California
Am J Public Health, November 1, 2001; 91(11): 1808 - 1814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
O. Ozturk, K. Armstrong, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Templeton
Fetal antecedents of male factor sub-fertility: how important is birthweight?
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2238 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
M. Seid, J. W. Varni, and P. S. Kurtin
Measuring Quality of Care for Vulnerable Children: Challenges and Conceptualization of a Pediatric Outcome Measure of Quality
American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2000; 15(4): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
P. F Visintainer, J. Uman, K. Horgan, A. Ibald, U. Verma, and N. Tejani
Reduced risk of low weight births among indigent women receiving care from nurse-midwives
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2000; 54(3): 233 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text]