Olfactory Deficits in Boys With Cleft Palate
1 From the Departments of Pediatrics, Otolaryngology, and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center at Syracuse, Syracuse
An odor identification task was used to determine whether individuals with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) also have an increased prevalence of olfactory deficits. Olfactory responses of 35 affected subjects (7 to 22 years of age) were compared with those of 68 subjects of comparable age without cleft palates. Subjects were requested to identify the smell of ten common household odors. They selected their responses from an alphabetized list of the test odorants. After a practice trial, the set of odorants was presented five times in randomized sequences. The percentage of correct responses increased with age for prepubertal and pubertal subjects without cleft palates. Although the olfactory scores of girls without cleft palates continued to increase after puberty, this trend was absent in boys. On the average, the girls with cleft palates had olfactory scores comparable with those of girls who did not have cleft palates, whereas affected boys averaged scores that were much lower than those of boys without cleft palates. Ten of the 20 boys with cleft palates, compared with only three of 34 boys without cleft palates, had olfactory scores less than 60% correct. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the magnitude or direction of the relationship between any of the subtypes of cleft palate and olfactory dysfunction. In this study, cleft palate is more strongly associated with olfactory deficits in boys than in girls, suggesting the possibility that the deficit may be a sex-influenced trait.
Key Words: cleft palate olfactory deficit sex-influenced trait
Submitted on October 19, 1987
Accepted on December 22, 1987
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Chalouhi, P. Faulcon, C. Le Bihan, L. Hertz-Pannier, P. Bonfils, and V. Abadie Olfactory Evaluation in Children: Application to the CHARGE Syndrome Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): e81 - e88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





