PEDIATRICS Vol. 81 No. 1 January 1988, pp. 172-173
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOLLER, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MOLLER, J. H.

Who Should or Can Peer Review Subspecialty Programs?

JAMES H. MOLLER MD1

1 Chairman, Section on Cardiology, American Academy of Pediatrics

To the Editor.—

The Section of Cardiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, has approved the following statement concerning peer review of pediatric cardiology programs. In its goal statement, the American Academy of Pediatrics states:

The goal of the Academy shall be the attainment by all children of the Americas of the full potential for physical, emotional, and social health. The Academy shall endeavor to accomplish this goal through the following scientific and educational objectives:

A. Foster measures and conduct activities directed toward establishing and maintaining the highest possible standards of quality, acceptability, and delivery of health care to children.