PEDIATRICS Vol. 80 No. 6 December 1987, pp. 949-951
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GREENSHER, J.
Right arrow Articles by CARACCIO, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GREENSHER, J.
Right arrow Articles by CARACCIO, T. R.

Ascendency of the Black Bottle (Activated Charcoal)

JOSEPH GREENSHER MD1, HOWARD C. MOFENSON MD1, and THOMAS R. CARACCIO PHARMD1

1 Department of Pediatrics, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY, and The Long Island Regional Poison Control Center, East Meadow, NY

Previous well-established guidelines for the management of poisonous ingestions in children are undergoing significant change. The time-honored practice of syrup of ipecac-induced vomiting as the primary means of gastrointestinal decontamination now frequently yields to the administration of activated charcoal. Practitioners and emergency room physicians who are increasingly relying on advice from and participation in treatment by regional poison control centers need to understand the rationale behind what many consider contradictions to accepted teaching.

A case in point was a recent letter to the American Academy of Pediatrics from a pediatrician questioning the treatment of an ingestion of poison in a toddler.