PEDIATRICS Vol. 80 No. 5 November 1987, pp. 763-764
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ALTSCHUL, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ALTSCHUL, M. S.

Larger Numbers Needed

MARTIN S. ALTSCHUL MD1

1 Pediatrics, 2400 Lancaster Dr, NE, Salem, OR 97305

To the Editor.—

In a letter to Pediatrics Cunningham1 suggested that there might be methodologic problems with the study of urinary tract infection and circumcision by Wiswell et al.2 Wiswell responded with further retrospective data.3,4 In an effort to shed more light on this subject, I have collected data on all cases of infants younger than 1 year of age with urinary tract infection admitted to Northwest Region Kaiser Foundation Hospitals from 1979 through 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
R. S. Van Howe
A Cost-Utility Analysis of Neonatal Circumcision
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 584 - 601.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
T. E. Wiswell and W. E. Hachey
Urinary Tract Infections and the Uncircumcised State: An Update
Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 1993; 32(3): 130 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]