PEDIATRICS Vol. 80 No. 3 September 1987, pp. 451-457
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Brownlee, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleveland, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Brownlee, R. C.

Future Training of Pediatricians: Summary Report of a Series of Conferences Sponsored by the American Board of Pediatrics

William W. Cleveland MD1 and Robert C. Brownlee MD1

1 From the American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Recently, the American Board of Pediatrics sponsored three conferences for consideration of specific issues relative to the training and practice of pediatricians. Two of these, to be described briefly, served as background for the third, which will be reported in detail.

The first meeting was held in San Antonio, TX, in January 1984, for the principal purpose of discussing the training and practice of subspecialists in pediatrics. The discussion was precipitated by a petition from the Sub-Board of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology to extend the period of training in hematology-oncology from 2 to 3 years. Dr David Nathan spoke on the certification of subspecialists. He questioned the concept, in general, and the specification of an exact period of time for training, in particular. He suggested that the length of training might be variable for the individual and occur at some time during the faculty appointment. Dr Charles Abildgaard presented the justification for extending training on behalf of the Sub-Board. The thrust of the argument was that the discipline has become so complex that 3 years are required to acquire clinical proficiency; the research component was also emphasized. His presentation precipitated general discussion of some questions related to practice: Should subspecialists function in community hospitals or only in academic medical centers? Should the Board certify only clinical competence or should there be certification of competence to do research? What will be the impact of the large number of graduating students and of the increasing number of women studying medicine and entering pediatrics?

At this meeting Dr Robert Brownlee proposed some changes in the pattern of certification.

Accepted on April 13, 1987




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
C. L. Carraccio and M. A. Berman
Intensive Care: Impact on Resident Education
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1994; 33(10): 625 - 627.
[PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. Listernick, R. R. Tanz, and A T. Davis
Carving a Niche: The General Academic Pediatrician as Consultant: Part II: Academic, Financial, and Educational Concerns
Clinical Pediatrics, December 1, 1988; 27(12): 583 - 586.
[Abstract] [PDF]