PEDIATRICS Vol. 80 No. 3 September 1987, pp. 409-414
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Boutwell, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by Boutwell, W. C.

Successful Direct Extubation of Very Low Birth Weight Infants From Low Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Rate

Eun H. Kim MD1 and Walter C. Boutwell MD1

1 From the Newborn Division, Department of Pediatrics, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California

It is common practice to use endotracheal continuous positive airway pressure for various time periods up to 24 hours before attempting extubation in infants who are mechanically ventilated. A few studies in newborns have indicated that airway resistance is increased through small endotracheal tubes. This increases the work of breathing and the likelihood of subsequent ventilatory failure. In this study, 27 very low birth weight infants who were frac12 to 28 days old at the time of extubation were randomly divided into two groups. One group of 13 study infants were extubated directly from intermittent mandatory ventilation rates of six to ten per minute, and the other 14 control infants were placed on continuous positive airway pressure through endotracheal tubes for six hours prior to an attempt to extubate. There was no difference between the two groups in gestational age, postnatal age, weight, or severity of lung disease at the time of extubation. All 13 study infants were successfully extubated without significant apnea or respiratory acidosis. Of the 14 control infants, only seven were successfully extubated; six infants had significant apnea and in one infant respiratory acidosis with pH 7.13 and Pco2 65 developed while receiving continuous positive airway pressure (13/13 v 7/14, P < .005). The seven infants who failed the preextubation trial of continuous positive airway pressure were later extubated from low intermittent mandatory ventilation rates without significant pnea or respiratory acidosis. Furthermore, slight CO2 retention developed in the very low birth weight infants after six hours of continuous positive airway pressure but not after direct extubation (mean change Pco2 ± SD: 4.43 ± 3.87 v -0.23 ± 3.79 mm Hg, P < .01). This study demonstrates that the recommended preextubation trial of continuous positive airway pressure through an endotracheal tube is not only unnecessary but detrimental to very low birth weight infants, in whom more apnea and slight CO2 retention develop probably because of increased airway resistance through small endotracheal tubes.

Key Words: extubation • intermittent mandatory ventilation • very low birth weight infant • mechanical ventilation • continuous positive airway pressure • apnea • airway resistance

Submitted on August 4, 1986
Accepted on December 11, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. Tsuchida, D. Engelberts, M. Roth, C. McKerlie, M. Post, and B. P. Kavanagh
Continuous positive airway pressure causes lung injury in a model of sepsis
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): L554 - L564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
B. M. Stefanescu, W. P. Murphy, B. J. Hansell, M. Fuloria, T. M. Morgan, and J. L. Aschner
A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Systems for the Successful Extubation of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1031 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S. K Sinha and S. M Donn
Weaning from assisted ventilation: art or science?
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2000; 83(1): 64F - 70.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C. Morley
Continuous distending pressure
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 1999; 81(2): 152F - 156.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
N J Robertson and P A Hamilton
Randomised trial of elective continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with rescue CPAP after extubation
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 1998; 79(1): 58F - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text]