PEDIATRICS Vol. 80 No. 2 August 1987, pp. 215-219
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, C. A.

Circumcision Decision: Prominence of Social Concerns

Mark S. Brown MD1 and Cheryl A. Brown RN, MS1

1 From the Departments of Perinatology and Nursing, Children's Hospital at St Luke's Hospital, Denver

Despite policy statements against routine circumcision of newborns by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology more than 10 years ago, there has been virtually no change in circumcision practices in the United States. In addition, controlled trials of programs to educate parents about the lack of medical indications for routine newborn circumcision have shown that parental education has little impact on the circumcision decision. We hypothesized that parents based their circumcision decision predominantly on social concerns rather than on medical ones. We prospectively surveyed parents of 124 newborns soon after they made the circumcision decision to learn their reasons for the decision. The strongest factor associated with the circumcision decision was whether or not the father was circumcised (P.0001). The survey also showed that concerns about the attitudes of peers and their sons' self concept in the future were prominent among parents deciding to circumcise. The circumcision decision in the United States is emerging as a cultural ritual rather than the result of medical misunderstanding among parents. In counseling parents making the circumcision decision, the health care provider should provide a knowledgeable and honest discussion of the medical aspects of circumcision. Until information is available that addresses parents' social concerns about circumcision, it is unreasonable to expect a significant change in circumcision customs in the United States.

Key Words: circumcision • newborn

Submitted on November 1, 1985
Accepted on August 5, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Med. EthicsHome page
M Fox and M Thomson
A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2005; 31(8): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
D. T. Gray
Neonatal Circumcision: Cost-Effective Preventive Measure or "the Unkindest Cut of All"?
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2004; 24(6): 688 - 692.
[PDF]

Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
B. J. Mears
Ethics of Neonatal Male Circumcision
AAP Grand Rounds, October 1, 2003; 10(4): 50 - 50.
[Full Text] [PDF]