PEDIATRICS Vol. 80 No. 2 August 1987, pp. 196-202
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dworkin, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cullina, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dworkin, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cullina, J.

Does Developmental Content Influence the Effectiveness of Anticipatory Guidance?

Paul H. Dworkin MD1, Deborah Allen PhD1, M. Alex Geertsma MD1, Leslie Solkoske PNP1, and Joseph Cullina MD1

1 From the Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, and St Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut

We conducted a prospective, controlled study to evaluate the value of discussing developmental stages with mothers while providing anticipatory guidance during health maintenance visits. Eighty-three inner city mothers and their healthy, first-born infants were recruited within three days of birth and randomly assigned to either a control or intervention group. All mother-infant pairs were seen by the same pediatric provider for health maintenance visits when the infants were 2 weeks, 2 months, 4 months, and 6 months of age. At each visit, anticipatory guidance for all mothers included discussions of such age-appropriate issues as nitrition, safety, sleep, and common problematic behaviors. For the 39 intervention group mothers, the basis for such information was explained through age-specific discussions of affective, cognitive, and physical development. Dependent variables measured after the 6-month visit included maternal-infant interaction; maternal perceptions of infant temperament, family adaptation and adjustment, and satisfaction with the infant's behavior and development; and maternal satisfaction with pediatric services. Analyses of variance demonstrated no significant effect of treatment group on any of the outcome measures. These results do not support the importance of routinely discussing developmental stages during anticipatory guidance and suggest that specific, age-appropriate issues may be discussed without emphasizing the developmental basis for such information.

Key Words: well-child care • health maintenance • anticipatory guidance • child development

Submitted on August 7, 1986
Accepted on October 10, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
P. H. Dworkin
2003 C. Anderson Aldrich Award Lecture: Enhancing Developmental Services in Child Health Supervision--An Idea Whose Time Has Truly Arrived
Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 827 - 831.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
E. Dinkevich and P. O. Ozuah
Well-Child Care: Effectiveness of Current Recommendations
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 2002; 41(4): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. Regalado and N. Halfon
Primary Care Services Promoting Optimal Child Development From Birth to Age 3 Years: Review of the Literature
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 2001; 155(12): 1311 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]