PEDIATRICS Vol. 79 No. 1 January 1987, pp. 129-137
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hibbard, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoekelman, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hibbard, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hoekelman, R. A.

Genitalia in Children's Drawings: An Association With Sexual Abuse

Roberta A. Hibbard MD1, Klaus Roghmann PhD1, and Robert A. Hoekelman MD1

1 From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York

Many sexual abuse victims have been observed to draw genitalia on human figures. To test the hypothesis that sexually abused children draw genitalia on human figures more often than do nonabused children, drawings from 57 children, 3 through 7 years of age, who were referred to child protective services as alleged sexual abuse victims, were compared with drawings from an age-, sex-, race-, and socioeconomically matched group of 55 nonabused children receiving well-child care in medical settings. A standardized procedure to obtain drawings was followed by a structured interview to collect demographic, past medical, and developmental information. Five evaluators unaware of the children's backgrounds independently examined drawings for the presence or absence of five body parts; there was 94% agreement for all body parts and 93% agreement for genitalia. Eight children were excluded from the analysis because they only scribbled (n = 5) or because evaluators could not agree on whether genitalia were present in their drawings (n = 3). Ten percent (5/52) of the alleged sexual abuse victims and 2% (1/52) of the comparison children drew genitalia (P = .10, one-tailed Fisher exact test). The estimated relative risk was 5.4; that is, alleged sexual abuse victims were 5.4 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children. Children known to have been sexually abused were 6.8 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children (P = .07, one-tailed Fisher exact test). It must be cautioned that, although the presence of genitalia in a child's drawing should alert one to consider the possibility of sexual abuse, it does not prove it, just as the absence of genitalia does not exclude abuse. The drawing of genitalia should sensitize providers and influence the effort directed toward exploring the possibility of sexual abuse.

Key Words: child sexual abuse • genitalia • human figure drawing

Submitted on December 26, 1985
Accepted on April 14, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
N. Kellogg and and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect
The Evaluation of Sexual Abuse in Children
Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 506 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Child MaltreatHome page
L. Palmer, A. R. Farrar, M. Valle, N. Ghahary, M. Panella, and D. DeGraw
An Investigation of the Clinical Use of the House-Tree-Person Projective Drawings in the Psychological Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse
Child Maltreat, May 1, 2000; 5(2): 169 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Sexual Abuse of Children: Subject Review
Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 186 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]