Genitalia in Children's Drawings: An Association With Sexual Abuse
1 From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
Many sexual abuse victims have been observed to draw genitalia on human figures. To test the hypothesis that sexually abused children draw genitalia on human figures more often than do nonabused children, drawings from 57 children, 3 through 7 years of age, who were referred to child protective services as alleged sexual abuse victims, were compared with drawings from an age-, sex-, race-, and socioeconomically matched group of 55 nonabused children receiving well-child care in medical settings. A standardized procedure to obtain drawings was followed by a structured interview to collect demographic, past medical, and developmental information. Five evaluators unaware of the children's backgrounds independently examined drawings for the presence or absence of five body parts; there was 94% agreement for all body parts and 93% agreement for genitalia. Eight children were excluded from the analysis because they only scribbled (n = 5) or because evaluators could not agree on whether genitalia were present in their drawings (n = 3). Ten percent (5/52) of the alleged sexual abuse victims and 2% (1/52) of the comparison children drew genitalia (P = .10, one-tailed Fisher exact test). The estimated relative risk was 5.4; that is, alleged sexual abuse victims were 5.4 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children. Children known to have been sexually abused were 6.8 times more likely to draw genitalia than were comparison children (P = .07, one-tailed Fisher exact test). It must be cautioned that, although the presence of genitalia in a child's drawing should alert one to consider the possibility of sexual abuse, it does not prove it, just as the absence of genitalia does not exclude abuse. The drawing of genitalia should sensitize providers and influence the effort directed toward exploring the possibility of sexual abuse.
Key Words: child sexual abuse genitalia human figure drawing
Submitted on December 26, 1985
Accepted on April 14, 1986
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Kellogg and and the Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect The Evaluation of Sexual Abuse in Children Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 506 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Palmer, A. R. Farrar, M. Valle, N. Ghahary, M. Panella, and D. DeGraw An Investigation of the Clinical Use of the House-Tree-Person Projective Drawings in the Psychological Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse Child Maltreat, May 1, 2000; 5(2): 169 - 175. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect Guidelines for the Evaluation of Sexual Abuse of Children: Subject Review Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 103(1): 186 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Peterson, M. Hardin, and M. J. Nitsch The Use of Children's Drawings in the Evaluation and Treatment of Child Sexual, Emotional, and Physical Abuse Arch Fam Med, May 1, 1995; 4(5): 445 - 452. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Goldberg and A. Yates The Use of Anatomically Correct Dolls in the Evaluation of Sexually Abused Children Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, December 1, 1990; 144(12): 1334 - 1336. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||








