PEDIATRICS Vol. 78 No. 3 September 1986, pp. 526-528
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Screening for Developmental Disabilities

Committee on Children With Disabilities

Early identification and treatment of developmental disabilities that cause school-related problems is of considerable importance to practicing pediatricians. The motivation for early identification programs is: (1) to identify the barriers to children's participation in the educational process, (2) to assist these children and their families in finding medical, educational, or other appropriate services, and (3) to overcome or mitigate the adverse effects of the disability.

The need for visual and auditory examinations to identify deficits in these areas is readily accepted. Use of these examinations is standard practice. However, use of preschool examinations for developmental problems, potential learning disabilities, and mental retardation needs to be encouraged. These disorders, which may be less obvious, may have a major impact on the physical and mental health of children and their families.

Screening identifies most children who have or who are at risk of having developmental disabilities. Pediatricians have the opportunity to incorporate screening examinations in the context of well-child care and to refer their patients for confirmatory testing by an appropriate consultant, if indicated.

The conduct of a scheduled health evaluation, as described in Academy guidelines,1 includes a systematic evaluation of development at all ages, commencing in the perinatal period. Simple instruments that identify developmental problems are readily available.2-4 These tests assure early identification of a range of developmental disabilities.

Specific safeguards, including carefully developed guidelines and procedures, should accompany the application of such screening tests when practiced as part of a large community-based program, as well as in the pediatrician's office. Participation by pediatricians in the development and implementation of these screening procedures will assure that such efforts are comprehensive and effective.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
D. Rydz, M. I. Shevell, A. Majnemer, and M. Oskoui
Topical Review: Developmental Screening
J Child Neurol, January 1, 2005; 20(1): 4 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. Berman
Caring for Parents vs Caring for Children: Is There a Difference?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2003; 157(3): 221 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
F. P. Glascoe
Are Overreferrals on Developmental Screening Tests Really a Problem?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2001; 155(1): 54 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
F. P. Glascoe, F. Oberklaid, P. H. Dworkin, and F. Trimm
Brief Approaches to Educating Patients and Parents in Primary Care
Pediatrics, June 1, 1998; 101 (6): e10 - e10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
F. P. Glascoe, E. M. Foster, and M. L. Wolraich
An Economic Analysis of Developmental Detection Methods
Pediatrics, June 1, 1997; 99(6): 830 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
F. P. Glascoe and K. E. Byrne
The Usefulness of the Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test
Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 1993; 32(5): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [PDF]