PEDIATRICS Vol. 78 No. 1 July 1986, pp. 58-64
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alon, U.
Right arrow Articles by Berant, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alon, U.
Right arrow Articles by Berant, M.

Ultrasonography in the Radiologic Evaluation of Children With Urinary Tract Infection

Uri Alon MD1, Menucha Pery MD1, Giora Davidai MD1, and Moshe Berant MD1

1 From the Section of Pediatric Nephrology and the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology and Pediatrics, Ramban Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

A prospective blind study comparing the findings of ultrasonography, intravenous pyelography, and voiding cystourethrography was conducted on 81 patients to examine the place of ultrasonography in the initial radiologic evaluation of children with urinary tract infection. The patients' mean age was 4.8 years; 15 were male. Forty-eight were inpatients (mean age, 3.2 years) and 33 were outpatients (mean age, 7.2 years). In 29 patients (35.8%) abnormality of the urinary system was detected by one or more of the three imaging procedures; 21 were inpatients and eight were outpatients. The most frequent finding was vesicoureteral reflux, occurring in 62.1% of the pathologic cases. The findings at ultrasonography correlated well with those of intravenous pyelography in 73 of the 81 studies (90.1%), but they failed to demonstrate double collecting systems and several of the minor changes. However, ultrasonography in combination with cystourethrography identified all patients who had abnormal urinary systems, except for two children with negligible findings. Moreover, ultrasonography and cystourethrography together identified all 11 patients, nine of them inpatients, in whom surgical treatment was indicated. It is concluded that ultrasonography can successfully replace intravenous pyelography as a screening imaging procedure for the urinary system, but because of the superiority of intravenous pyelography in the detection of some types of lesions, intravenous pyelography will be required whenever ultrasonography or cystourethrography results are abnormal. Accordingly, and in view of the differences in the frequency and severity of pathologic findings between outpatients and hospitalized patients, the following protocol is suggested for the radiologic evaluation of children with urinary tract infection: For outpatients, cystourethrography can be performed 4 to 6 weeks after cessation of antibiotic therapy. If the study is normal, ultrasonography can be done; if this is also normal, no further radiologic workup is needed. Only when cystourethrography or ultrasonography findings are abnormal is intravenous pyelography also indicated. For hospitalized patients, especially young children, ultrasonography can be used as the early screening procedure, within two to four days after the diagnosis of urinary tract infection. If the results are normal, cystourethrography can follow after 4 to 6 weeks; if abnormal, cystourethrography can be performed after ten to 14 days. Here, too, intravenous pyelography is needed only when ultrasonography and/or cystourethrography results are abnormal.

Key Words: ultrasonography • radiologic evaluation • urinary tract infection

Submitted on July 25, 1985
Accepted on October 24, 1985




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
S J Andrews, P T Brooks, D C Hanbury, C M King, C M Prendergast, G B Boustead, and T A McNicholas
Ultrasonography and abdominal radiography versus intravenous urography in investigation of urinary tract infection in men: prospective incident cohort study
BMJ, February 23, 2002; 324(7335): 454 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. M. Downs
Technical Report: Urinary Tract Infections in Febrile Infants and Young Children
Pediatrics, April 1, 1999; 103(4): 54e - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
U. S. Alon and S. Ganapathy
Should Renal Ultrasonography Be Done Routinely in Children with First Urinary Tract Infection?
Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1999; 38(1): 21 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
E Stokland, M Hellstrom, S Hansson, O Jodal, A Oden, and B Jacobsson
Reliability of ultrasonography in identification of reflux nephropathy in children
BMJ, July 23, 1994; 309(6949): 235 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text]