PEDIATRICS Vol. 77 No. 6 June 1986, pp. 811-815
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krongrad, E.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krongrad, E.
Right arrow Articles by O'Neill, L.

Near Miss Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Episodes? A Clinical and Electrocardiographic Correlation

Ehud Krongrad MD1 and Linda O'Neill RN, MA1

1 From the Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Babies Hospital, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City

The study was carried out to validate objectively the relationship between clinical impressions of parents and ECG evidence of life-threatening arrhythmias in infants considered to be at high risk. Twenty infants considered to be at high risk were provided with a hospital grade home monitor with a hard copy-recording capability (n = 12) and/or an ECG telephone transmision system (n = 8). There were 93 alarms considered by the parents as true alarms. All of the ECG tracings recorded during the 93 episodes were normal. Infant stimulation was provided for 11 infants and was not administered during 82 of these alarms. None of the infants died and all are well at 1 year of age. Our data raises questions regarding parental clinical ability to correctly perceive a true near miss episode in most cases and may explain, in part, the lack of consistency noted in previously published physiologic studies of "high risk" populations. Finally, the study raises further questions regarding the use of parental impression alone without supportive objective data as an indication for therapy in the majority of such patients. Research efforts and application of therapeutic measures will benefit greatly by development of objective data to support and supplement parental clinical observations.

Key Words: near miss sudden infant death syndrome • home monitoring • electrocardiogram • sudden death

Submitted on July 29, 1985
Accepted on August 27, 1985




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
G. E. Freed and R. G. Meny
Apnea of Prematurity and Risk for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Pediatrics, August 1, 1999; 104(2): 297 - 298.
[Full Text]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
A. Steinschneider, C. Richmond, V. Ramaswamy, and A. Curns
Clinical Characteristics of an Apparent Life-Threatening Event (ALTE) and the Subsequent Occurrence of Prolonged Apnea or Prolonged Bradycardia
Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 1998; 37(4): 223 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
E. Gibson, S. Spinner, J. A. Cullen, H. A. Wrobel, and A. R. Spitzer
Documented Home Apnea Monitoring: Effect on Compliance, Duration of Monitoring, and Validation of Alarm Reporting
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1996; 35(10): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [PDF]