PEDIATRICS Vol. 77 No. 3 March 1986, pp. A88
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

BABIES' SEATS ARE AIR SAFETY ISSUE

The Federal Aviation Administration requires that every airline passenger wear a seat belt during takeoffs and landings—everyone, that is, except children under the age of 2.

Parents have two options: They can hold children in their laps, or since 1982 they have been allowed to provide their own Government-certified child's safety seat. But very few parents use the safety seats on board because it generally means having to buy a ticket for children who would otherwise fly free of charge.

Given the F.A.A. policy, travelers may have assumed that unrestrained children face little safety risk on aircraft. In fact, an unrestrained passenger of any age faces a higher risk of death or injury in a survivable crash or severe turbulence than passengers who are strapped into safety seats or belts.

Three years ago the agency denied a citizen's petition to require safety restraints for very young children.

To determine the cost of the proposed regulation, however, the F.A.A. estimated that 1 percent of the 280 million passengers, or 28,000, were under the age of 2 in 1982. Consequently, their parents would have had to spend $56 million on airline tickets to accommodate child safety seats, which might have prevented in the agency's calculation, a loss of life valued at $500,000.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?