PEDIATRICS Vol. 77 No. 2 February 1986, pp. 187-195
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Guild, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E.
Right arrow Articles by Guild, P.

Controlled Evaluation of Rural Regional Perinatal Care: Developmental and Neurologic Outcomes at 1 Year

Earl Siegel MD, MPH1, Dennis Gillings PhD1, Suzann Campbell LPT, PhD1, and Priscilla Guild MSPH1

1 From the Departments of Maternal and Child Health and of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, and Department of Medical Allied Health Professions, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill

The effectiveness of a rural regionalized perinatal care (RPC) program was evaluated by a controlled, population-based design. The RPC program, begun in a carefully selected study region in July 1975, evolved into a system of care which included the following major components: identification of high-risk pregnancies and high-risk newborn infants; obstetric and newborn consultation and referral services between Level I, II, and III centers; professional education for physicians, nurses, and other health professionals; and nutrition and social work consultation. Substantial resources were made available from 1975 to 1980 to implement this "total package" of RPC. A matched, control region was identified which, except for the RPC program, was as comparable as possible to the study region. It was hypothesized that the RPC intervention would have the following effects when the study region was compared with the control region: reduction in fetal and neonatal mortality, no increase in postneonatal mortality, and reduction in obstetric and newborn morbidity. These findings were reported previously. This paper presents results of hypothesized reductions in adverse developmental, neurologic, maternal-infant attachment, and selected physical health outcomes. A sample of 447 infants was assessed by an extensive battery of instruments at 1 year, adjusted for gestational age. The most notable findings were mothers' reports of receptive language development and observations of maternal attachment behaviors that significantly favored the study region. No significant differences between study and control regions were observed for Bayley Mental and Motor Scores, abnormal neurologic signs, and the physical health measures. The impact of rural RPC in North Carolina on the 1-year outcomes is discussed and policy implications are presented.

Key Words: rural perinatal care • neurologic outcome • developmental outcome

Submitted on November 28, 1983
Accepted on May 10, 1985




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
Z. A. Bhutta, G. L. Darmstadt, B. S. Hasan, and R. A. Haws
Community-Based Interventions for Improving Perinatal and Neonatal Health Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence
Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2/S1): 519 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]