PEDIATRICS Vol. 76 No. 2 August 1985, pp. 243-249
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Churella, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Churella, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, W. C., Jr

Survey: Methods of Feeding Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Helen R. Churella PhD1, Wendy L. Bachhuber BS1, and William C. MacLean Jr MD1

1 From the Medical Department, Ross Laboratories, Division of Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio

The directors of 269 neonatal intensive care units were surveyed to determine how low-birth-weight infants are being fed. Feeding practices were based on birth weight, with the smallest infants receiving parenteral nutrition for the longest time after birth. First enteral feedings usually were given by the nasogastric route in infants with birth weight of 1,500 g or less, but transpyloric feedings were used in 15% of neonatal intensive care units for infants with birth weight less than 1,000 g. The initial enteral feeding was sterile water in 56% to 58% of the neonatal intensive care units, but was glucose water or milk in the others. Once enteral feeding was established, both human milk from the infant's own mother and commercial formula were used. Whether human milk was mixed or alternated with infant formula, or whether some infants in the nursery were fed human milk while others were fed formula, was not determined. The type of infant formula fed to low-birth-weight infants depended on the infant's birth weight and clinical status. Both human milk and formula were supplemented with energy (fat or carbohydrates) and vitamins, but not with calcium and phosphorus, in most neonatal intensive care units. Some vitamins, such as vitamins A and D, may be oversupplemented, while others, such as folic acid, may be undersupplemented.

Key Words: infant • low birth weight • milk • human • infant nutrition • nutrition surveys • enteral feeding

Submitted on July 9, 1984
Accepted on October 27, 1984




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
N. E. Embleton, N. Pang, and R. J. Cooke
Postnatal Malnutrition and Growth Retardation: An Inevitable Consequence of Current Recommendations in Preterm Infants?
Pediatrics, February 1, 2001; 107(2): 270 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
S. Dollberg, J. Kuint, R. Mazkereth, and F. B. Mimouni
Feeding Tolerance in Preterm Infants: Randomized Trial of Bolus and Continuous Feeding
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2000; 19(6): 797 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R. J. Schanler, R. J. Shulman, C. Lau, E. O'B. Smith, and M. M. Heitkemper
Feeding Strategies for Premature Infants: Randomized Trial of Gastrointestinal Priming and Tube-feeding Method
Pediatrics, February 1, 1999; 103(2): 434 - 439.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. M. Akintorin, M. Kamat, R. S. Pildes, P. Kling, S. Andes, J. Hill, and S. Pyati
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Feeding Methods in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Pediatrics, October 1, 1997; 100(4): e4 - e4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]