PEDIATRICS Vol. 75 No. 5 May 1985, pp. 883-886
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ellison, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, C. B.

A Note on Interdisciplinary Research in Developmental/Behavioral Pediatrics/Psychology

Patricia H. Ellison MD1 and Claire B. Kopp PhD1

1 From the Departments of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, and University of California, Los Angeles

In sum, we have offered a few observations about the practice of interdisciplinary research. Now, in addition to our rather specific suggestions, we want to add a few general comments about the interactions of professionals who are actually involved in interdisciplinary research.

Collaboration between physicians and psychologists can be enriching, stimulating, and rewarding. But it can also be problematic, because the former do not have much exposure to research and the latter do not have much exposure to clinical issues. Bringing these skills together may require many hours of discussion and reading each other's publications.

Overall, physicians need to improve their research skills. Reading statistics texts, taking courses, handling data sets, reviewing other researchers' statistical designs are all reasonable strategies.

Psychologists also need to expand their knowledge base. Reading the clinical literature is a start, but this ought to be supplemented by consistent exposure to the clinical milieu. The physician, who has access to the clinical milieu, needs to be sensitive to the question of exposure.

Our final comments about collaboration are perhaps the most sensitive ones. The maintenance of a solid physician and psychologist research collaboration requires thoughtfulness, understanding, tact, and nurturance. Consider the status and responsiblities of the physician. He or she often outranks the psychologist, has access to the subject population, daily confronts ethical issues surrounding patient diagnoses, and controls communication of information to child and family. A sense of being in charge develops. Consequently, the psychologist may be perceived as being an adjunct to the research, responsible for day-to-day operations and committing ideas to paper. This is not a good formula for research.

There are no easy answers for resolving these difficult interpersonal situations. Some interdisciplinary teams have found that frequent communication helps, others have turned to interinstitution collaborations, and a few have established written guidelines for almost all aspects of the research (responsibility for decision making, day-to-day operations, first authorship on articles, etc). Addressing these delicate issues in the beginning, with intermittent reexamination, will generally lead to a successful endpoint.

These reflections are offered to our colleagues in the hope that interdisciplinary research will thrive and become a mainstay of both pediatrics and developmental psychology. After all, facilitating the growth of the child is a primary goal for each discipline.

Submitted on April 9, 1984
Accepted on May 23, 1984