PEDIATRICS Vol. 73 No. 6 June 1984, pp. 777-780
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R. McN.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlings, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R. McN.
Right arrow Articles by Rawlings, P.

Ineffectiveness of Historical Data in Predicting Measles Susceptibility

Robert McN. Scott MD1, Adrienne B. Butler MD1, Manuel Schydlower MD1, and Peter Rawlings MD1

1 From the Department of Virus Diseases, Wafter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, and Department of Pediatrics, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas

The Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP) has devised noninvasive, historical criteria for determining individuals who are susceptible to measles. These criteria, which involve proof of vaccination, are incorporated into school entrance regulations and are used to indicate people who require vaccination during outbreaks. In a recent measles epidemic in El Paso, TX, 120,000 records were screened using these criteria, and as a result 13,000 students were vaccinated. During this outbreak, 91 adolescents, who were susceptible to measles by ACIP criteria, were serologically tested for measles antibody. Although none of these students had documentation of vaccination, only 11.0% of them lacked measles hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) antibody at a titer of 5. Assuming a minimum cost for vaccine of $2.60 per dose, a conservative estimate of the cost to the El Paso Health Department for 20,000 doses of measles vaccine would be $52,000. If these data can be extrapolated to the total student population, then upwards of 85% of vaccinated students were already immune. Thus, $44,200 was spent unnecessarily. In addition, as the ACIP criteria did not select for measles susceptibility, an estimated 12,000 students in El Paso were not protected against measles. Other methods to determine measles susceptibility should be developed for optimal control of future outbreaks.

Key Words: measles serology • measles outbreak control • immunization • measles vaccine

Submitted on March 23, 1983
Accepted on August 19, 1983