PEDIATRICS Vol. 72 No. 2 August 1983, pp. 213
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

EFFICACY OF TREATMENT

The "gospel" of randomization is based on a pyramid [of six steps] conveying the hierarchy of strength of evidence concerning the efficacy of treatment: (1) anecdotal case reports, (2) series without controls, (3) series with literature controls, (4) series with historical controls, (5) single randomized clinical trials, and (6) confirmed randomized clinical trials. The spectrum of evidence ranges from individual anecdotal case reports to findings confirmed in multiple randomized trials. It is certainly true that efficacious treatments can be identified in the lower numbered steps of the pyramid. If an investigator happens to "hit a home run" in such a manner and discovers a cure for a previously untreatable disease, then it may not be necessary to initiate further studies. Smaller gains, however, require more stringent proof. I would argue that without steps 5 and 6 (ie, randomized trials), it is impossible truly to convince the scientific community about the efficacy of treatment.