PEDIATRICS Vol. 71 No. 5 May 1983, pp. 854-855
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOSS, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MOSS, A. J.

Criteria for Diastolic Pressure: Revolution, Counterrevolution, and Now a Compromise

ARTHUR J. MOSS MD1

1 Department of Pediatrics, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles

In 1967, an editorial entitled, "The Criterion for Diastolic Pressure: Revolution and Counterrevolution" appeared in a cardiology journal.1 The comments centered on deliberations of three committees appointed through the years by the American Heart Association. The charge of these committees was, among other things, to resolve the issue of whether the fourth phase of Korotkoff sounds (muffling) or the fifth phase (cessation) is the proper index of diastolic pressure.

In 1939, the American Heart Association, together with the Cardiac Society of Great Britain and Ireland, recommended quite definitely that the fourth phase should be considered the index of diastolic pressure.2

REVOLUTION

In 1951, a second committee of the American Heart Association reversed the recommendation of the 1939 International Committee and stated that the fifth phase was to be regarded as the more reliable index of diastolic pressure.3