1 From the Children's Hospital of San Francisco and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco
The effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the ventilatory response to CO2 in newborn infants is unknown. The CO2 response to 4% CO2 in air was studied in nine preterm infants without lung disease before and during administration of CPAP (4 to 5 cm H2O) delivered by face mask. Minute ventilation, tidal volume, respiratory frequency, and end-tidal Pco2 were measured, and the slope and intercept of the CO2 response were calculated. Respiratory pattern and changes in oxygenation were also analyzed by measuring inspiratory and expiratory time, mean inspiratory flow, mean expiratory flow, effective respiratory timing, endtidal Po2, and transcutaneous Po2. CPAP significantly decreased minute ventilation from 278.7 to 197.6 mL/mm/kg (P < .001). Tidal volume and respiratory frequency were also significantly decreased. The slope of the CO2 response during CPAP was not significantly different from the slope before CPAP (36 v 33 mL/min/kg/mm Hg, P > .1), but the intercept was shifted to the right (P < .001). The decrease in respiratory frequency was primarily due to a prolongation of expiratory time (P < .05). In addition, transcutaneous Po2 increased during administration of CPAP (P < .001). These findings indicate that: (1) CPAP significantly decreases ventilation in preterm infants without lung disease, affecting both tidal volume and respiratory frequency; (2) CPAP does not appreciably alter the ventilatory response to CO2; (3) the changes in respiratory frequency are primarily accounted for by a prolongation of expiratory time; (4) CPAP improves oxygenation.
Key Words: continuous positive airway pressure CO2 response respiratory pattern preterm infants
Submitted on January 19, 1982
Accepted on July 2, 1982
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. S Owen, C. J Morley, and P. G Davis Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2007; 92(5): F414 - F418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Viemari, M. Bevengut, P. Coulon, and G. Hilaire Nasal Trigeminal Inputs Release the A5 Inhibition Received by the Respiratory Rhythm Generator of the Mouse Neonate J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2004; 91(2): 746 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Jackson, J. Vellucci, P. Johnson, and H. W. Kilbride Evidence-Based Approach to Change in Clinical Practice: Introduction of Expanded Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use in an Intensive Care Nursery Pediatrics, April 1, 2003; 111(4): e542 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Gaon, S Lee, S Hannan, D Ingram, and A D Milner Assessment of effect of nasal continuous positive pressure on laryngeal opening using fibre optic laryngoscopy Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 1999; 80(3): 230F - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||