Challenge of Pediatric Education
1 Department of Pediatrics, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles
The paper by Starfield1 is provocative and discomforting to all pediatricians whether clinician-practioner or academician-educator. She issues a keen challenge to us, and that is healthy for any professional discipline, certainly for a specialty discipline characterized by optimism and resilience. The data base for Starfield's analysis of pediatric practice is limited by confinement to the conclusion of an era of more abbreviated or traditional subspecialty-oriented graduate pediatric training. She reflects about the practice patterns of pediatricians who were trained before the seminal deliberations and conclusions of the Task Force on Pediatric Education.2 The Task Force and the certifying and accrediting arms of American pediatrics initiated sweeping changes in the philosophy and structure of pediatric residency training.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. D. Jones Jr, G. A. McGuinness, L. R. First, L. K. Leslie, and and the Residency Review and Redesign in Pediatric Linking Process to Outcome: Are We Training Pediatricians to Meet Evolving Health Care Needs? Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S1 - S7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Jones Jr, G. A. McGuinness, and C. L. Carraccio The Residency Review and Redesign in Pediatrics (R3P) Project: Roots and Branches Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S8 - S11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





