PEDIATRICS Vol. 70 No. 6 December 1982, pp. 926-930
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by DePasse, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by DePasse, B. M.

Oral Penicillin Prophylaxis in Children with Impaired Splenic Function: A Study of Compliance

George R. Buchanan MD1, Jane D. Siegel MD1, Susan J. Smith PNP1, and Bonnie M. DePasse MT, ASCP1

1 The Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, Southwestern Medical School Dallas

One measure used to prevent overwhelming sepsis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae in children with defective splenic function is oral penicillin prophylaxis. However, a frequently cited argument against this approach is the likelihood of poor compliance. Compliance was studied by examining urine specimens for penicillin by the Sarcina lutea disc diffusion technique in 22 surgically asplenic children, two patients following bone marrow transplantation, and 38 infants and young children with sickle cell disease. Multiple specimens (mean 3.5 per patient) were examined in 43 of the children. Overall, 125/188 (66%) of the urine samples contained penicillin, indicating compliance within the previous 12 to 24 hours. Compliance tended to improve on subsequent clinic visits. These relatively good results were attributed to an intensive educational program in which repetitive efforts are made to counsel patients and parents about the risks of life-threatening infection. Poor compliance should no longer be invoked as a reason not to study the efficacy of prophylactic penicillin in functionally or surgically asplenic subjects.

Key Words: sickle cell • splenectomy • penicillin • Streptococcus pneumoniae • compliance

Submitted on February 19, 1982
Accepted on March 2, 1982




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JAMAHome page
C. M. Sox, W. O. Cooper, T. D. Koepsell, D. L. DiGiuseppe, and D. A. Christakis
Provision of Pneumococcal Prophylaxis for Publicly Insured Children With Sickle Cell Disease
JAMA, August 27, 2003; 290(8): 1057 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. J. Teach, K. A. Lillis, and M. Grossi
Compliance With Penicillin Prophylaxis in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 1998; 152(3): 274 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]