The Irresponsible Expert Witness: A Failure of Biomedical Graduate Education and Professional Accountability
1 Departments of Pediatrics, Radiology and Anatomy, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia
Many forces have created the epidemic of negligence and malpractice litigation. One of the contributing factors to the rising rate of nonmeritorious litigation is the increasing number of unqualified and irresponsible expert witnesses. The high remuneration has attracted physican-scientists who are unaware of the proper role of an expert witness. They are frequently manipulated by the attorneys and function as partisans rather than scholars. The role of the expert witness should be taught in medical and graduate school. Testimony should be treated as a scholarly endeavor and experts should be encouraged to seek peer review of their opinions and not to testify secretly and in isolation. It is suggested that greater visibility of experts and their testimony (light of day phenomenon) should raise the quality of expert witness testimony and encourage more qualified experts to participate as expert witnesses, thus removing the stigmata usually associated with unqualified expert witnesses.
Submitted on May 14, 1982Accepted on July 2, 1982
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. Brent The Daubert Decision Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 2222 - 2225. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L Chadwick The evidence base in child protection litigation BMJ, July 22, 2006; 333(7560): 160 - 161. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. O. Bonow, D. P. Zipes, J. L. Anderson, M. D. Cheitlin, L. B. Goldstein, A. O. Grant, D. Faxon, J. A.C. Lima, and R. M. Robertson Task force 5: Expert testimony and opinions J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1747 - 1749. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. O. Bonow, D. P. Zipes, J. L. Anderson, M. D. Cheitlin, L. B. Goldstein, A. O. Grant, D. Faxon, J. A. C. Lima, and R. M. Robertson Task Force 5: Expert Testimony and Opinions Circulation, October 19, 2004; 110(16): 2535 - 2537. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Brent Environmental Causes of Human Congenital Malformations: The Pediatrician's Role in Dealing With These Complex Clinical Problems Caused by a Multiplicity of Environmental and Genetic Factors Pediatrics, April 1, 2004; 113(4/S1): 957 - 968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Berlin The Miasmatic Expert Witness Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 29 - 35. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Milunsky Lies, Damned Lies, and Medical Experts: The Abrogation of Responsibility by Specialty Organizations and a Call for Action J Child Neurol, June 1, 2003; 18(6): 413 - 419. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committee on Medical Liability Guidelines for Expert Witness Testimony in Medical Malpractice Litigation Pediatrics, May 1, 2002; 109(5): 974 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Brent Addressing Environmentally Caused Human Birth Defects Pediatr. Rev., May 1, 2001; 22(5): 153 - 165. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. L. Chadwick and H. F. Krous Irresponsible Testimony by Medical Experts in Cases Involving the Physical Abuse and Neglect of Children Child Maltreat, November 1, 1997; 2(4): 313 - 321. [Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Fadjo and R.L. Bucciarelli Peer Review of the Expert Witness: An Opportunity to Improve Our Medical Liability System J Child Neurol, September 1, 1995; 10(5): 403 - 404. [PDF]
|
|
