PEDIATRICS Vol. 67 No. 5 May 1981, pp. 647-652
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yanagi, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yanagi, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, C. E.

Indomethacin Treatment for Symptomatic Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Double-Blind Control Study

Ruth M. Yanagi MD1, Allen Wilson MD1, Edgar A. Newfeld MD1, Kalim U. Aziz MD1, and Carl E. Hunt MD1

1 Department of Pediatrics, Prentice Women's Hospital and Children's Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University, Chicago

A double-blind control study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of indomethacin treatment of patients with symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus. Infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome and symptomatic patent ductus arteriosus were eligible for this prospective study if the ratio of left atrial/aortic root diameter remained ge 1.3:1 following a 24-hour period of medical management. Thirty-nine eligible infants were randomly assigned to the control or indomethacin group and given 0.2 mg/kg of enteral indomethacin or placebo in a double-blind manner. Second and third doses were administered at 24-hour intervals in phase 1 (17 patients), and at eight-hour intervals in phase 2 (22 patients). The 75% patent ductus arteriosus closure rate with indomethacin treatment in phase 1 was not statistically significant due to a 44% spontaneous closure rate in the control group. In phase 2, however, 85% of the indomethacin group demonstrated patent ductus arteriosus closure vs only 11% in the matched control group (P .01). Although no indomethacin side effects occurred in phase 1, in phase 2 indomethacin administration was associated with minimal, but statistically significant, transient impaired renal function and, in three infants (23%), mild upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In summary, enteral administration of three 0.2 mg/kg indomethacin doses at eight-hour intervals thus appears to be a safe and effective alternative to surgical closure.

Submitted on May 9, 1980
Accepted on August 21, 1980