PEDIATRICS Vol. 66 No. 5 November 1980, pp. 685-689
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rahilly, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rahilly, P. M.

Effects of 2% Carbon Dioxide, 0.5% Carbon Dioxide, and 100% Oxygen on Cranial Blood Flow of the Human Neonate

P. M. Rahilly BSc (Hons), MD, MACP1

1 Neonatal Research Group, Department of Physiology, The London Hospital Medical College, London

The effects of breathing 100% O2, 2% CO2, and 0.5% CO2 on the cranial blood flow of the normal human baby were investigated. A mercury in Silastic strain gauge was placed around the occipital head circumference (OFC) of a sleeping infant, and jugular flow was measured using venous occlusion plethysmography. Cranial flow was calculated using formulas derived from an electrical model. In matched sleep states cranial blood flow fell with 100% O2 (mean from eight babies = 32.8%), and rose with 2% CO2 (mean from seven babies = 40.6%). With 0.5% CO2 the flow rose in three babies and did not change in another four. These results indicate the extreme sensitivity of cerebral vasculature to the nature of the ambient gas.

Submitted on March 14, 1979
Accepted on April 17, 1980




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Iscoe and J. A. Fisher
Hyperoxia-Induced Hypocapnia: An Underappreciated Risk
Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 430 - 433.
[Full Text] [PDF]