Parents' Perceptions of the Psychological and Social Impact of Home Monitoring
1 Department of Social Service and the Children's Service, Massachusetts General Hospital; the Department of Research, Simmons College School of Social Work; and the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston
Self-assessments of 133 parents' (74 families) feelings, perceptions, reactions to stresses, and satisfactions during a period of electronic home monitoring are reported. Data were collected during structured interviews by students in a graduate social work program. Although extreme anxiety was prevalent initially, only 27.4% of the parents felt they were very anxious beyond the first month. Social life was restricted in 55.7% but job attendance was seldom affected. Only four parents felt very irritated by the increased demands of the monitored baby. The majority (72.9%) said that the monitor made them feel more comfortable with their baby. Only 14.2% felt that their marriage relationship worsened during the period of monitoring; two couples separated. Most supportive to parents were their spouses, least supportive were friends and relatives. With availability of a psychosocial support system, electronic home monitoring of infants can be conducted by parents without constant and extreme anxiety and, in their judgment, can even be a satisfying experience.
Submitted on July 23, 1979Accepted on November 7, 1979
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. H. Judson Protective Care: Mothering a Child Dependent on Parenteral Nutrition Journal of Family Nursing, February 1, 2004; 10(1): 93 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gibson, S. Spinner, J. A. Cullen, H. A. Wrobel, and A. R. Spitzer Documented Home Apnea Monitoring: Effect on Compliance, Duration of Monitoring, and Validation of Alarm Reporting Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 1996; 35(10): 505 - 513. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Camfield, C. Camfield, P. Bagnell, and E. Rees Infant Apnea Syndrome: A Prospective Evaluation of Etiologies Clinical Pediatrics, November 1, 1982; 21(11): 684 - 687. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||






