PEDIATRICS Vol. 66 No. 1 July 1980, pp. 103-108
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Francis, P. W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Levison, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Francis, P. W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Levison, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Oral and Inhaled Salbutamol in the Prevention of Exercise-Induced Bronchospasm

Paul W. J. Francis MB, BS, FRACP1, Inese R. B. Krastins MCPA1, and Henry Levison MD1

1 Pulmonary Function Laboratory, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto

Oral salbutamol in a dose of 0.15 mg/kg of body weight was compared to a total dose of 0.2 mg of salbutamol aerosol in its ability to produce bronchodilation and to prevent exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) in 16 asthmatic children in a single-blind crossover study. The degree of bronchodilation seen 120 minutes after the oral salbutamol was equal to that seen 40 minutes after the salbutamol aerosol as assessed by peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC (FEF25-75%), and maximum expiratory-flow after 75% of the FVC had been expired (V25). With respect to changes in PEF and FEV1, both active agents were equally effective in blocking EIB following a standardized treadmill exercise test. However, in assessing changes in FEF25-75%, and V25 following exercise, the aerosol was slightly but significantly more effective than the oral preparation in blocking EIB. Oral salbutamol was clinically effective in preventing EIB for 4.9 to 5.8 hours. The aerosol route has the advantages of a faster onset of action, fewer side effects, and greater protection against EIB with respect to small airways function. Nevertheless, for patients who are unable to use a metered aerosol, oral salbutamol is a useful alternative both as a bronchodilator and in preventing EIB.

Submitted on July 25, 1979
Accepted on November 19, 1979


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?