PEDIATRICS Vol. 65 No. 5 May 1980, pp. 964-970
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Messenger, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weitzman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Messenger, K. P.

An After-Hours Pediatric Walk-In Clinic for an Entire Urban Community: Utilization and Effectiveness of Follow-Up Care

Michael Weitzman MD1, Margot S. Moomaw MS1, and Katherine P. Messenger MCP1

1 Department of Health Services, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston

A retrospective record review was used to examine utilization of a pediatric walk-in clinic available to an entire urban community and to evaluate the effectiveness of follow-up care for a sample of the users of this facility who receive their regular pediatric care at a local comprehensive child health center. Results indicate that this walk-in facility is used extensively for the care of nonemergency conditions. The findings did not, however, support the generally accepted belief that a disproportionate number of Medicaid-supported and minority children overuse emergency type facilities. Utilization did not differ by race or medical care financing. Only 35.6% of the children who were advised to make a follow-up visit to the health center actually did so. White children complied significantly more often than black children (48.0% vs 15.8%). A larger percentage of patients for whom follow-up was optional (48.5%) than for whom follow-up was recommended (35.6%) made a return visit. Noncompliance with recommendations concerning follow-up care of adult users of emergency type facilities is a well recognized problem; the present study demonstrates a similar problem among children.

Submitted on February 26, 1979
Accepted on July 23, 1979




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. E. McNulty, L. C. Hampers, and S. E. Krug
Primary Care and Emergency Department Decision Making
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2001; 155(11): 1266 - 1270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Promot PractHome page
A. C. Gregg, M. DeHaven, J. Meires, A. Kane, and G. Gullison
Perspectives on Adherence to Recommended Health Behavior among Low-Income Patients
Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2001; 2(2): 162 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
V. Sharma, S. D. Simon, J. M. Bakewell, E. F. Ellerbeck, M. H. Fox, and D. D. Wallace
Factors Influencing Infant Visits to Emergency Departments
Pediatrics, November 1, 2000; 106(5): 1031 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text]