PEDIATRICS Vol. 64 No. 6 December 1979, pp. 904-912
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wannamaker, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, E. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wannamaker, L. W.

Significance of Quantitative Salivary Cultures for Group A and Non-group A beta-Hemolytic Streptococci in Patients with Pharyngitis and in Their Family Contacts

Edward L. Kaplan MD1, Robert Couser MD1, Barbara Ballard Huwe RN1, Carolyn Mckay MD1, and Lewis W. Wannamaker MD1

1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis

One hundred ninety-six individuals, 86 with clinically overt pharyngotonsillitis and 110 of their clinically negative contacts were studied to evaluate the sensitivity and the specificity of quantitative saliva cultures for group A beta-hemolytic streptococci. We also compared this technique with semiquantitative throat cultures as a means of isolating group A streptococci and of differentiating the streptococcal carrier state from patients with bona fide streptococcal upper respiratory tract infection as defmed by the presence of an antibody response. The data indicate that the throat culture is a more reliable means of identifying group A beta-hemolytic streptococci in the upper respiratory tract than is the saliva culture. The converse is true for non-group A beta-hemolytic streptococci; the saliva culture is a much better means for isolating these organisms. In individuals positive by both techniques we found good correlation between the degree of positivity of the saliva culture and the degree of positivity of the throat culture. Furthermore, while there was a definite trend for individuals with strongly positive cultures to demonstrate more often an antibody rise in either antistreptolysin O and/or antideoxynibonuclease B—indicating bona fide infection—this relationship was not sufficiently constant to provide a clear differentiation. This study also indicates that discordance (one positive, one negative) of simultaneous duplicate semiquantitative throat cultures is much more common among individuals who do not show an antibody response ("carriers") than among those with an antibody response (bona fide infection). This study confirms our previous observations suggesting that the presence of C-reactive protein in the serum of patients with a positive culture for group A streptococci and clinical signs and symptoms of pharyngitis is often an indication of true streptococcal upper respiratory tract infection, and that even with a positive saliva culture at the initial visit, a negative C-reactive protein is only infrequently (25%) associated with an antibody response.

Submitted on January 22, 1979
Accepted on April 27, 1979




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Infect. Immun.Home page
S. A. Shelburne III, C. Granville, M. Tokuyama, I. Sitkiewicz, P. Patel, and J. M. Musser
Growth Characteristics of and Virulence Factor Production by Group A Streptococcus during Cultivation in Human Saliva
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2005; 73(8): 4723 - 4731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
S. Zwart, M. M Rovers, R. A de Melker, and A. W Hoes
Penicillin for acute sore throat in children: randomised, double blind trial
BMJ, December 6, 2003; 327(7427): 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]