Potential Effect of Demographic and Other Variables in Studies Comparing Morbidity of Breast-Fed and Bottle-Fed Infants
1 Medical Department, Ross Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio
Comparing the morbidity of breast-fed and bottle-fed infants is confounded by inherent differences in breast-feeding and bottle-feeding mothers and their infants. Self-selection introduces complex variables encompassing much more than milk source used for infant feeding. Reasons for selecting breast or bottle feeding relate to demographic, socioeconomic, educational, ethnic, cultural, and psychological factors, as well as maternal and infant physical and emotional health. Many of the differences in the maternal populations may affect infant care practices, access to medical care, and infant health status.
Studies published to date have not quantified these confounding effects and other potential biases in comparing morbidity of breast- and bottle-fed infants and the relationship between milk source and incidence of infantile disease remains in question. There is need for more cautious use of the available data and investigators must seek ways to design future studies to take into account the differences between breast-feeding and bottle-feeding mothers that affect both reported and actual infant morbidity.
Submitted on April 17, 1979Accepted on June 18, 1979
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  J. R. Britton and H. L. Britton Maternal Self-Concept and Breastfeeding J Hum Lact, November 1, 2008; 24(4): 431 - 438. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S Kramer, L. Matush, I. Vanilovich, R. W Platt, N. Bogdanovich, Z. Sevkovskaya, I. Dzikovich, G. Shishko, J.-P. Collet, R. M Martin, et al. Effects of prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding on child height, weight, adiposity, and blood pressure at age 6.5 y: evidence from a large randomized trial Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1717 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Britton, H. L. Britton, and V. Gronwaldt Breastfeeding, Sensitivity, and Attachment Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): e1436 - e1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S. Kramer, T. Guo, R. W. Platt, S. Shapiro, J.-P. Collet, B. Chalmers, E. Hodnett, Z. Sevkovskaya, I. Dzikovich, and I. Vanilovich Breastfeeding and Infant Growth: Biology or Bias? Pediatrics, August 1, 2002; 110(2): 343 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Kramer, B. Chalmers, E. D. Hodnett, Z. Sevkovskaya, I. Dzikovich, S. Shapiro, J.-P. Collet, I. Vanilovich, I. Mezen, T. Ducruet, et al. Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): A Randomized Trial in the Republic of Belarus JAMA, January 24, 2001; 285(4): 413 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. D. Scariati, L. M. Grummer-Strawn, and S. B. Fein A Longitudinal Analysis of Infant Morbidity and the Extent of Breastfeeding in the United States Pediatrics, June 1, 1997; 99(6): e5 - e5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Cunningham Studies of breastfeeding and infections. How good is the evidence? A critique of the answer from Yale J Hum Lact, June 1, 1988; 4(2): 54 - 56. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Hellings A Discriminant Model to Predict Breast-Feeding Success West J Nurs Res, November 1, 1985; 7(4): 471 - 478. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Eiger, A. R. Rausen, and J. Silverio Breast- vs. Bottle-Feeding: A Study of Morbidity in Upper Middle Class Infants Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 1984; 23(9): 492 - 495. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
