Overwhelming Infection with Group B
-Hemolytic Streptococcus Associated with Circumcision
1 The University of Texas Medical School, Houston
The lack of valid medical indications has caused routine neonatal circumcision to fall into disrepute in recent years.1-3 However, despite the substantial arguments against continuation of this therapy, it still ranks as one of the most common surgical procedures.3,4
Significant infection is rarely solely attributed to circumcision because a clear-cut cause and effect relationship is difficult to establish. There have been reports5-7 of newborns who have been circumcised and then developed life-threatening infection within several days of this procedure. However, the fact that in these infants infection has occurred at an age when the incidence of infection is high due to other factors complicates interpretation of these reports.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K Fluegge, P Greiner, and R Berner Late onset group B streptococcal disease manifested by isolated cervical lymphadenitis Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 1019 - 1020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Albanyan and C. J. Baker Is Lumbar Puncture Necessary to Exclude Meningitis in Neonates and Young Infants: Lessons From the Group B Streptococcus Cellulitis-Adenitis Syndrome Pediatrics, October 1, 1998; 102(4): 984 - 985. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






