PEDIATRICS Vol. 63 No. 4 April 1979, pp. 685
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larson, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Larson, M. L.

THE SOCIALIZATION OF THE NEW PROFESSIONAL

M. L. Larson

For most recognized professions, an orderly career begins with training in professional schools or universities. The authoritative and authoritatian framework of relations between teachers and students is a fundamental element of institutionalized professional socialization. The hierarchy of excellence and prestige by means of which a profession legitimizes its internal stratification is produced in the university; professional recruits internalize it, first, in that context. The student's inevitable subordination and acceptance of his teachers' supervision are immediately and tacitly justified in terms of the teachers' greater expertise. The interrelations between the context of training and the contexts of practice are personalized; the teaching elites of a profession are often elite practitioners in the field. In any case, their personal sponsorship guarantees the proper socialization of the students to the professional world outside the school. As Friedson and Rhea remark: "Successful completion of a professional education in an objective measure of . . . technical and normative socialization, but its inadequacy seems to be implied by the characteristic tendency of professionals to rely on personal testimonials and recommendations."

These personalized warrants do more than simply insure the adequate socialization of the new professional, guaranteeing that his "compliance and consent" will not be too difficult to obtain; they reinforce the control by an elite and the latter's legitimacy. Prestige filters down, from the "great men" in a field to those who study or work under them, through ideological mechanisms; the formation of cults and the vicarious enjoyment of the great man's prestige by his underlings are characteristic of the training situation, but they also extend to the world of work.