PEDIATRICS Vol. 60 No. 5 November 1977, pp. 715-720
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suran, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lavigne, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suran, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lavigne, J. V.

Rights of Children in Pediatric Settings: A Survey of Attitudes

Bernard G. Suran Ph.D.1 and John V. Lavigne Ph.D.1

1 Children's Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago

This study compares the attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward the bill of rights for children in pediatric settings of the National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutions (NACHRI) and a locally developed ombudsman committee bill of rights. Parents (N = 64), attending physicians (N = 33), resident physicians (N = 17), nurses (N = 27), nonmedical professionals (N = 35), administrators (N = 18), and clerical workers (N = 17) were surveyed. Each person rated statements derived from the bills from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Analyses of variance indicated a high level of agreement overall for both bills by all groups; however, the local bill was significantly preferred. There were significant differences in agreement between the groups for the local bill and the two bills combined (an overall measure of attitudes about children's rights in pediatric settings). Attending physicians tended to agree significantly less than other groups. On the 32 individual items, attending or resident physicians were significantly lower in agreement than most other groups on 11 items, and nurses were lowest on one other. Disagreement was strongest on items concerning abortion or contraception, the child's right to privacy, the right to consent to care, and the right to have an immediate response from the physician in understandable language.

Submitted on February 2, 1977
Accepted on June 29, 1977