1 Joseph S. Barr Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children's Service, and the Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital; and the Departments of Pediatrics and Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston
A questionnaire designed to identify the factors that influence the resolution of ethical dilemmas was returned by 230 (57% of the total) Massachusetts pediatricians. The decision to recommend surgery for an infant with Down's syndrome with duodenal atresia when the parents had refused surgery was influenced by religious affiliation (P < .01), religious activity (P < .04), and sex (P = .05). Of those favoring surgery, 40.2% would pursue a court order. The decision to recommend surgery for an infant with severe meningomyelocele when the parents' position was not stated was influenced by age (P < .01), religious activity (P < .02), and specialization (P < .008). When the parents' wishes were expressed, the majority of the pediatricians modified their decision in accord with these wishes. In response to general ethical questions, 79.6% of all pediatricians thought that parents should have the right to withold consent for surgery. Equal numbers thought that psychosocial reasons justified withholding lifesaving procedures. Among a variety of factors, they thought that willingness of the parents to care for the child would influence the decision to take heroic measures. There were 90.4% who thought that ethics should be part of medical education; 55.7% indicated this need throughout their careers.
Submitted on August 19, 1976
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. D. Boss, N. Hutton, L. J. Sulpar, A. M. West, and P. K. Donohue Values Parents Apply to Decision-Making Regarding Delivery Room Resuscitation for High-Risk Newborns Pediatrics, September 1, 2008; 122(3): 583 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Singh, J. Fanaroff, B. Andrews, L. Caldarelli, J. Lagatta, S. Plesha-Troyke, J. Lantos, and W. Meadow Resuscitation in the "Gray Zone" of Viability: Determining Physician Preferences and Predicting Infant Outcomes Pediatrics, September 1, 2007; 120(3): 519 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Boyle Paradigm Cases in Decision Making for Neonates NeoReviews, November 1, 2004; 5(11): e477 - e483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Meadow, L. Frain, Y. Ren, G. Lee, S. Soneji, and J. Lantos Serial Assessment of Mortality in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit by Algorithm and Intuition: Certainty, Uncertainty, and Informed Consent Pediatrics, May 1, 2002; 109(5): 878 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Streiner, S. Saigal, E. Burrows, B. Stoskopf, and P. Rosenbaum Attitudes of Parents and Health Care Professionals Toward Active Treatment of Extremely Premature Infants Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 108(1): 152 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Southgate, D. J. Annibale, T. C. Hulsey, and D. M. Purohit International Experience With Trisomy 21 Infants Placed on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pediatrics, March 1, 2001; 107(3): 549 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rebagliato, M. Cuttini, L. Broggin, I. Berbik, U. de Vonderweid, G. Hansen, M. Kaminski, L. A. A. Kollee, A. Kucinskas, S. Lenoir, et al. Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: Physicians' Attitudes and Relationship With Self-reported Practices in 10 European Countries JAMA, November 15, 2000; 284(19): 2451 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hermann and K. Mehes Physicians' Attitudes Regarding Down Syndrome J Child Neurol, January 1, 1996; 11(1): 66 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H.A. Haslam and R. Milner The Physician and Down Syndrome: Are Attitudes Changing? J Child Neurol, July 1, 1992; 7(3): 304 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Strong Defective Infants and Their Impact on Families: Ethical and Legal Considerations J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 1983; 11(4): 168 - 172. [PDF] |
||||