1 Departments of Pediatrics and Community Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh
The eardrums of millions of infants and children throughout the world contain foreign bodies, surgically implanted as prostheses. Myringotomy combined with placement of an indwelling tympanostomy tube (or grommet) has gained widespread acceptance among otolaryngologists as the treatment of choice for persistent middle ear effusion1 and for certain related otologic conditions. But otolaryngologists by no means stand alone: many if not most of the operations currently performed were initially recommended by pediatricians.
It is difficult to determine how many such operations are currently performed on pediatric patients in this country, since most operations take place in outpatient settings and therefore escape systematic reportage. A reasonable estimate, however, would be 1 million procedures per year or, because most of them are bilateral, two million tubes inserted.
Among the conditions for which the operation is performed, undoubtedly the most common is chronic secretory otitis media. Here there are three interrelated objectives: to remove the effusion, to relieve any associated hearing loss, and to institute and maintain middle ear ventilation. Less commonly the operation may be undertaken for one of various other reasons: to try to reduce the frequency of episodes of acute otitis media2,3; to relieve persistent underaeration of the middle ear when associated with conductive hearing loss or other symptoms2; or to prevent the development of adhesive otitis media or cholesteatoma when atelectasis or, especially, retraction pockets of the eardrum are present.2,4-6
The idea of using an indwelling tube to artificially ventilate the middle ear dates from 1868, when the great Viennese otologist, Politzer, introduced a ventilating eyelet made of hard rubber.7
Submitted on December 13, 1976
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Paradise A 15-Month-Old Child With Recurrent Otitis Media JAMA, November 27, 2002; 288(20): 2589 - 2598. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ah-Tye, J. L. Paradise, and D. K. Colborn Otorrhea in Young Children After Tympanostomy-Tube Placement for Persistent Middle-Ear Effusion: Prevalence, Incidence, and Duration Pediatrics, June 1, 2001; 107(6): 1251 - 1258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Paradise, H. M. Feldman, T. F. Campbell, C. A. Dollaghan, D. K. Colborn, B. S. Bernard, H. E. Rockette, J. E. Janosky, D. L. Pitcairn, D. L. Sabo, et al. Effect of Early or Delayed Insertion of Tympanostomy Tubes for Persistent Otitis Media on Developmental Outcomes at the Age of Three Years N. Engl. J. Med., April 19, 2001; 344(16): 1179 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Coyte, R. Croxford, W. McIsaac, W. Feldman, and J. Friedberg The Role of Adjuvant Adenoidectomy and Tonsillectomy in the Outcome of the Insertion of Tympanostomy Tubes N. Engl. J. Med., April 19, 2001; 344(16): 1188 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Cohen, Y. Shechter, M. Slatkine, N. Gatt, and R. Perez Laser Myringotomy in Different Age Groups Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, March 1, 2001; 127(3): 260 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. McIsaac, P. C. Coyte, R. Croxford, C. V. Asche, J. Friedberg, and W. Feldman Otolaryngologists' perceptions of the indications for tympanostomy tube insertion in children Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 1, 2000; 162(9): 1285 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Harkness, A. Melhus, A. Hermansson, R. M. Rosenfeld, J. L. Paradise, J. Froom, L. Culpepper, and J. L. Paradise Controversies: Treatment of Acute Otitis Media JAMA, June 10, 1998; 279(22): 1783 - 1785. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||