PEDIATRICS Vol. 59 No. 6 June 1977, pp. 864
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

PROMISING TREATMENT

Boston Interhospital Virus Study Group

It is often suggested that controlled trials of promising treatments are unwarranted in conditions of very high mortality; severe respiratory distress syndrome has been used as an example. This is completely logical if the arguments are confined to the category of inevitably fatal conditions, but the situation is rarely this simple.

A Boston group wrote about this issue as follows:

"Patients with severe and fatal . . . disease merely represent the ‘tip of an iceberg’ for there are almost always many more with milder or even asymptomatic processes. Furthermore, the increased interest in diagnosis that accompanies the introduction of any new mode of therapy invariably results in the recognition of less severe cases that would previously have gone undiagnosed. Consequently, there is sure to be a lower morbidity and mortality in currently treated patients than in otherwise comparable historical controls, even when the treatment is without effect or actually deleterious."