PEDIATRICS Vol. 59 No. 1 January 1977, pp. 146
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Strassman, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, H. J., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Strassman, S. S.

Dr. Leslie et al. Reply

Hugh J. Leslie Jr. M.D.1, Kenneth C. Reeb M.D.1, Leonard P. Rome M.D.1, and Selig S. Strassman M.D.1

1 Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio 44106

We acknowledge the difficulties and dangers inherent in interpreting results of attitudinal surveys. However, we are not aware of any direct, objective evidence of the impact of teachimig on the quality of the teacher's performance as a practitioner. Thus, we sought whatever evidence was available. Our own experiences indicate that the stimulation of teaching and the repeated questioning by both the teacher and student, which is a part of the teaching process, have led in our programn to a more critical approach to self-education and clinical practice.